A special administrative region (SAR) of China, Hong Kong includes a partially-autonomous political and legal system, such as a restricted form of democracy evolved out of the days under British colonial rule.Those limits along with also the inability of this authorities to keep a transition to full democracy have been criticized by the city’s resistance, also ignited mass protest movements. And surely, there’s a whole lot to consider problem with.On Thursday, the constraints of democracy in this system appeared to contract further, since the authorities resisted a dozen candidates from standing in legislative acts, also warned more disqualifications have been coming.The election — that was scheduled for September 6, however on Friday was postponed for 12 months on account of this coronavirus pandemic — are the first as a new federal safety legislation came into effect, criminalizing secession, subversion, terrorism and international interference. That law has had a significant chilling effect, and may have ceased the town’s protest movement in its tracks. The government now seems to be arriving after its critics over the legislature. Those influenced by the ban include activist Joshua Wong, a pioneer of the 2014 Umbrella Movement, along with other former student protesters, but also mainstream candidates from pro-democracy parties and several average incumbent lawmakers, such as Dennis Kwok and Alvin Yeung. While candidates are barred from standing at the past, and a few removed from office once chosen, the high number of these beating this week, and also the wide justifications given to do this, raise questions over whether it’s likely to have meaningful opposition in Hong Kong. Political testsWhile the choices to pub 12 legislators were produced by returning officers into their respective constituencies — low level bureaucrats — the Hong Kong and Chinese authorities quickly put out claims in support of their move.Under Hong Kong’s Basic Law, the town’s de facto constitution, potential legislators must vow to “uphold” the constitution, a statement that’s been largely procedural previously. But citing a court case at 2016 barring a pro-independence candidate, the authorities said in a statement which vowing to “uphold” Basic Law “denotes not only compliance with it, but in addition an intention to encourage, encourage, and adopt it.” The authorities also gave examples of behaviour that would lead to disqualification, such as advocating for Hong Kong liberty or self-determination, or “soliciting intervention by foreign governments or governmental authorities.”While such behaviour is tolerated in many democracies — both British and Canadian parliaments include publicly secessionist parties such as — all are recently prohibited in Hong Kong, under the safety law.Other cases, however, are far more consistent with what it means to become an opposition fighter, such as “expressing a goal” to “indiscriminately (vote) down some legislative suggestions, appointments, funding applications and budgets introduced by (the authorities ) in order to induce the authorities to accede to specific political demands.” This seems to be in reaction to a strategy from some from the pro-democracy camp, when they gained a majority in the legislature, to vote leader Carrie Lam’s budget, forcing a constitutional crisis and possibly her resignation. Nominees will also to be prosecuted when they say “an event in principle” to the enactment of the safety law. And though that the government promised the law wouldn’t be retroactive, many returning officials cited applicants’ resistance to the law before its enactment as a reason for barring themsomething which could lead to a lot more disqualifications given that nearly the whole pro-democracy motion was united in opposing the law. Free and fair?In its announcement behind the disqualification of applicants this week, also hinting at more to come, the authorities said that there was “no question of any political censorship, limitation of their liberty of speech or deprivation of their right to stand for elections as alleged by some members of their community.” “The (Hong Kong) authorities respects and protects the lawful rights of Hong Kong people, such as the right to vote and the right to stand for elections. Additionally, it has an obligation to implement and maintain the Basic Law and make sure that elections will be conducted in keeping with the Basic Law and applicable electoral laws,” it added.However, the claim was immediately called into question by several, both in and away from the town, such as British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab who, in a statement, said it was apparent the candidates “were disqualified due to their political perspectives.” “The movement undermines the ethics of ‘One Country, Two Systems’ and also the rights and also freedoms guaranteed in the Joint Declaration and Hong Kong’s Basic Law,” additional Raab, speaking to this system that under global law guaranteed that the city’s liberty until 2047. The Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China, that signifies lawmakers in numerous countries such as the United Kingdom, Australia and Canada, said the disqualifications have been also a “further curtailing of Hong Kong’s way of life and will overpower present grievances from town at a time of increased stress.” Human rights groups, present lawmakers, political parties and other international authorities also have criticized the movement, together with Amnesty International saying that it revealed that an “intention to penalize calm criticism and advocacy of opposing views.” Though the election itself is now postponed as a result of coronavirus, though it goes ahead, it appears likely it won’t contain many of the very popular or notable pro-democracy figures from town, and perhaps few serious resistance candidates in any way. There are echoes in this the proposition put forward by Beijing in 2014 for how Hong Kong could pick its own leader. Unlike the present system, in which a very small committee chooses the chief executive, the Chinese authorities stated that Hong Kongers would find a vote — but Beijing would restrain that stands.