However, the President’s tweet was yet another display of democratic backsliding — a phrase used in political science to describe the erosion of institutions that maintain democracy.His baseless tweets about mail-in ballots and other things have sowed doubt about the validity of the autumn’s election and have been widely criticized. His recklessness is still among the greatest stories for the American press.Some of the behaviour was predictable from the very start. That is why I thought back to Sunday, January 22, 2017, and also the value of believing that your own eyes and ears.Anchoring a weekly news program such as CNN’s “Reliable Sources” could be odd sometimes. You get one shot per week and need to make it all count. In late 2016 and ancient 2017 I brought up the president-elect’s authoritarian strategies, mostly with respect to his strikes on the media.When I mimicked the scourge of both autocracy, also interviewed colleagues who clarified what it is like to operate in temperate climates, right-handed sites piled the ridicule.I second-guessed myself from time to time, such as every journalist should. I probed my scripts and scripts to get weaknesses.On the afternoon of this 22nd, before my 11 a.m. application, I had a heated telephone with then White House press secretary Sean Spicer about crowd-size-gate. The content of the phone was away from the album, but it had been apparent to me that something had shifted. Spicer was openly protecting Trump’s lies concerning the audience size in his inauguration that happened two days before. The White House was telling us to not think what we saw.That weekend CNN’s apps were anchored from a stunning rooftop at Washington, D.C., together with the Capitol dome in the space. I read a monologue with 50 concerns concerning the new age. I asked: “Will President Trump deny fact? Can he make his own false details and imitation stats?”Maybe I was naive, because we understood his past as a businessman, understood his willingness to say anything to advertise himself and demean his competitions. But we did not understand the way the Trump White House would function however. So I asked plenty of questions. “Will reporters quit attempting to fact-check?” (Happily they didn’t!) “is the target — to down us, to put on out us?” (Sounds like this.) “Who would you trust?”I went on: “Is Trump gaslighting ustrying to control, cause you to doubt your own eyes? Does he understand exactly what gaslighting means?”In retrospect, this is what the Trump years are about: “What will you think? Can you and your neighbors simply shrug, or are you going to need more honesty from the own government?”In the conclusion of the section, I stated my last questions were uneasy, but had to be inquired. I said: “Can taxpayers in dictatorships recognize what is happening right here, right now? Are you currently considering the initial two days of this Trump government and saying, ‘That is exactly what my chief does?’ What if we hear from them now?”I felt as though I had been outside on a limb a bit. Perhaps I’d gone a bit too much. Dictatorships? America’s democracy has been powerful. The president has been brand new. I meanhe was not floating the idea of elections! But he was making un-American noises.Three and years in, the sounds are much louder. My direct story in mid-February, on the last Sunday before coronavirus entirely took over the nation’s news cycle, was about “creeping authoritarianism.” It’s a worldwide narrative, as advocacy groups such as Freedom House have documented.Back in February, I quoted from “The Way Democracies Die,” that the 2018 novel: “The tragic paradox of the electoral route to authoritarianism is that democracy’s assassins utilize the associations of democracy, slowly, subtly, and even lawfully, to kill it.”The typical critics emerged from the woodwork again and stated the section was an overreaction. That is how it always goes. But democratic backsliding is actual. It’s among the greatest stories of the time.The stage isn’t about me or my monologues — it is about believing that your own ears and eyes. We may observe the story right in front of us. We can continue asking questions — and today we can answer a number of them.