As CBS Information teased a 60 Minutes interview with Bob Woodward over his bombshell new e book Rage, the star investigative journalist defended a lingering query over the timing of a few of its greatest revelations.
In line with the e book, Trump advised Woodward on Feb. 7 that the coronavirus posed a a lot better and lethal menace than he was letting on in public. Trump went on to downplay the virus, and it was not till March 13 that the White Home declared the outbreak a nationwide emergency.
So why didn’t Woodward sound the alarm again then, about what the president knew and when he knew it?
In an interview with The Washington Submit‘s Margaret Sullivan, Woodward mentioned throughout the month of February, there was not a panic over the virus and no requires Individuals to take social distancing or different precautions. He mentioned that “the biggest problem I had, which is always a problem with Trump, is I didn’t know if it was true.”
Donald Trump Admits Downplaying Menace Of Coronavirus As CNN Reveals First Large Bombshell Of Bob Woodward E-book
Woodward advised Sullivan that it could be a number of extra months to discern the place the president was getting his info. The objective, Woodward mentioned to Sullivan, was to get the larger image and to publish earlier than the election.
Authors routinely withhold particulars till a e book’s publication. John Bolton, for instance, offered particulars in his e book The Room The place It Occurred that might have created a sensation throughout impeachment proceedings. Woodward is dealing with questions on his timing partly due to he has an ongoing connection to The Washington Submit, the place he an affiliate editor, and since the coronavirus is a disaster like no different, an unprecedented public well being emergency.
As CNN and the Submit broke the information in regards to the e book on Tuesday, Jessica Huseman, a reporter for the investigative web site ProPublica, wrote on Twitter, “How differently might Trump’s supporters have acted if — this whole time — they knew that he knew COVID was a serious threat? Woodward could have made that happen in February.”
Wesley Lowery, correspondent for Quibi’s 60 Minutes 60 in 6, wrote, “Woodward‘s best defense is that folks spoke explicitly for a book, thus he didn’t feel comfortable using the reporting in other contexts. An ethical debate worth having. But no need to be incredulous about idea that reporting sooner could have saved lives— it obviously could have.”
Each day journalists did do deep dives into the administration’s coronavirus response, together with an April 11 New York Occasions story, He May Have Seen What Was Coming: Behind Trump’s Failure On the Virus. It didn’t comprise the identical revelations as Woodward’s e book, however the primary thrust of the story was that Trump performed down the menace at the same time as many within the administration have been figuring out the necessity for pressing motion. Like a lot else throughout the Trump years, the story created a stir for a day or two, then pale within the information cycle.
Woodward didn’t instantly return a request for remark. His writer, Simon & Schuster, referred to feedback he gave to the Related Press.
Woodward advised the AP that in May, when he had verified the knowledge, the virus had already unfold all through the nation. “If I had done the story at that time about what he knew in February, that’s not telling us anything we didn’t know,” he mentioned.
Rage can be revealed on Sept. 15, and it already appears to be standing out amid the wave of Trump-related books which have been touchdown earlier than the election.
On Wednesday, Woodward’s e book was main nationwide newscasts, Trump addressed it to reporters and his rival Joe Biden delivered blistering criticism at a marketing campaign cease. The e book’s revelations may have come too late to vary the way in which Individuals reply to the virus, however they might have an effect on how they view the election, with 54 days to go.