America-Mexico-Canada Settlement (USMCA) offers for monetary and digital commerce rules that harmonize the remedy of fintech firms.
North American firms leveraging digital property for funds ought to take into account strategic regional alternatives accessible beneath the brand new USMCA fintech Framework.
The USMCA Events (member nations) proceed to license fintech firms utilizing cryptocurrency and create regulatory sandboxes to incentivize experimentation with the brand new know-how beneath relaxed regulatory situations.
At over $30 billion USD in transactions a yr, the United States-Mexico remittance hall is among the largest on this planet. The fast improvement of cryptocurrencies has enabled cross-border transactions at only a fraction of the price and at unprecedented speeds, spurring collaboration between crypto innovators within the U.S. and Mexico. Quicker transferring cash doesn’t essentially imply much less price if there are too many competing and expensive regulatory regimes. The USMCA seeks to harmonize the remedy of monetary service suppliers throughout the three member nations.
The historic USMCA is greater than only a commerce settlement – it’s North America’s first multinational fintech treaty. Chapter 17 of the USMCA places the nations extra in keeping with World Commerce Group (WTO) ideas by looking for to make sure equal remedy of firms throughout member nations, defending market entry, and reevaluating the remedy of non-banking monetary providers. Below NAFTA, non-banking fintech firms handled competing regulatory frameworks, and there was little codified incentive to embrace the open banking motion.
The USMCA has aligned its member nations with the blockchain effort in direction of interoperability by creating constant requirements for the dealing with and sharing of buyer knowledge, prohibiting governments from discriminating in opposition to overseas fintech firms, and by making it simpler for fintech firms to supply providers in different USMCA nations. Notably, the settlement ensures monetary establishments entry to the fee and clearing methods of all different member nations. That is excellent news for crypto exchanges like Bitso who’re making an attempt to seize the on-demand liquidity marketplace for member nation banks and regional remittance funds networks.
Whether or not or not the USCMA ensures equal remedy of monetary innovation firms throughout borders, compliance beneath any world regulatory framework comes at a price. Cryptocurrencies’ unlucky remedy as a black-market asset by many regulatory authorities has resulted in demanding compliance necessities. The Monetary Motion Job Pressure (“FATF”), the worldwide cash laundering and terrorist financing watchdog, issued steerage to its 37 member nations requiring digital asset service suppliers to share sender and receiver info in sure sorts of cryptocurrency transactions. In the meantime, current FinCEN steerage has mandated strong anti-money laundering (“AML”) and know-your-customer (“KYC”) compliance applications for U.S. cash providers companies dealing in digital currencies.
To encourage fintech firms to innovate within the face of regulation, the US and Mexico have each adjusted their regulatory stances by novel licensures and regulatory sandboxes. By operation of the USMCA, fintech firms now have better entry to regulatory sandboxes and insurance policies adopted by any of the three taking part USMCA nations.
Regulatory fintech sandboxes are creating in the USA as a software to permit firms to experiment with monetary applied sciences beneath a relaxed, however closely-watched regulatory surroundings. The primary U.S. sandbox, pioneered by Arizona in 2017, offers restricted entry to Arizona’s market to check revolutionary monetary services or products with out first acquiring full state licensure or different authorizations that will in any other case be required. Different states, reminiscent of Wyoming, Utah, and Nevada have since adopted go well with with related sandboxes. On the federal degree, the Client Monetary Safety Bureau has launched a trial disclosure sandbox, a no-action letter coverage, and a compliance help sandbox making a secure harbor for revolutionary services and products for a restricted time frame whereas sharing knowledge with the Bureau. Though unsuccessfully contested by the New York State Division of Monetary Providers, the U.S. Workplace of Comptroller of the Forex has applied its coverage of contemplating purposes for particular goal nationwide bank charters from fintech firms which can be engaged within the enterprise of banking, however don’t take deposits.
Mexico, a Latin American chief in introducing open banking requirements, has enabled its regulatory authority to defer authorizations for brand spanking new monetary providers and has already issued specialised licenses for cryptocurrency exchanges to function as monetary know-how establishments. Though cryptocurrency’s future appears shrouded in regulatory uncertainty, the USMCA and its member nations’ shifting insurance policies in direction of monetary know-how makes it clear that monetary innovators have a number of regulatory choices to select from when contemplating improvement of recent providers or coming into new areas.
With the event of central bank backed currencies, together with proposed US laws introducing a “digital dollar,” there can be extra digital liquidity and curiosity in remittance options leveraging digital property and open banking requirements. Bi-national partnerships between member monetary establishments, fee processors, and cryptocurrency exchanges in the USA and Mexico have already fashioned, securing some firms strategic positions inside evolving digital remittance corridors. The remittance market is one to observe within the crypto trade, serving as a reminder to new and established monetary service firms to think about integrating with digital asset options in mild of recent discovered and regulatory efforts and protections.
 Emilio Rivero Coello, Are cryptocurrencies helpful for remittances?, CoinCenter (Jan. 6, 2020).
 See Luis Alejandro Estoup, “FinTech under the new United States-Mexico-Canada(USMCA) agreement,” Thomas Reuters Sensible Legislation (2020).
 See e.g., USMCA, Article 17.3 (“National Treatment”); USMCA, Article 17.4 (“Most Favored-Nation Treatment”); USMCA, Article 17.17 (“Transfer of Information”).
 USMCA, Article 17.15 (“Payment and Clearing Systems”).
 Monetary Motion Job Pressure, “Guidance for a Risk-Based Approach: Virtual Assets and Virtual Asset Service Providers,” (June 2019).
 FinCEN Launch No. FIN-2019-G001, “Application of FinCEN’s Regulations to Certain Business Models Involving Convertible Virtual Currencies,” (Could 9, 2019).
 H.B. 2434, 53d Leg., 2nd Reg Sess. (Ariz. 2018).
 See Kohen & Wales, “State Regulations on Virtual Currency and Blockchain Technologies,” (Aug. 29, 2019).
 See Valdex, Department, & Mainero, “Mexico Issues First License Under New FinTech Law,” (Feb. 24, 2020).
Copyright © 2020, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.