Repeats story printed on Friday with no modifications to textual content
WASHINGTON, Aug 28 (Reuters) – The Trump administration has decided that one other 11 Chinese language corporations, together with development big China Communications Development Firm, are owned or managed by the Chinese language army, the Pentagon stated on Friday, laying the groundwork for brand spanking new sanctions.
The Division of Protection earlier this yr designated 20 high Chinese language corporations as Chinese language army firms working immediately or not directly in america, together with these “owned or managed” by the Individuals’s Liberation Military that present industrial providers, manufacture, produce or export.
The up to date checklist additionally included China Three Gorges Company Restricted CYTGP.UL, Sinochem Group Co Ltd SASADA.UL and China Spacesat 600118.SS.
The Chinese language Embassy in Washington didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark.
The Pentagon’s designations don’t set off penalties, however a 1999 legislation that mandates compilation of the checklist says the president may impose sanctions that might embrace blocking all property of the listed events.
The Pentagon has come beneath strain from lawmakers of each U.S. political events to publish the checklist, amid rising tensions between Washington and Beijing over expertise, commerce and overseas coverage.
The checklist will seemingly add to tensions between the world’s two largest economies, which have been at loggerheads over the dealing with of the coronavirus pandemic and China’s transfer to impose safety laws on Hong Kong, amongst a number of factors of friction which have worsened this yr.
On Wednesday, america blacklisted 24 Chinese language firms, together with China Communications Development Firm, and focused people it stated have been a part of development and army actions within the South China Sea, the primary such U.S. sanctions transfer in opposition to Beijing over the disputed strategic waterway.
(Reporting by Mike Stone; Modifying by Steve Orlofsky and Richard Chang)
((email@example.com; https://twitter.com/MichaelStone; +1 646 223 6228))
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the writer and don’t essentially mirror these of Nasdaq, Inc.