A child and a girl wearing face masks found walking across a road on July 27, 2020 at Hong Kong, China.Vernon Yuen | NurPhoto | Getty ImagesHong Kong’s legislative council election will be postponed by a year, the town’s chief Carrie Lam declared Friday amid a fresh surge in coronavirus cases.The vote has been originally scheduled to happen on Sept. 6 but will now occur on Sept. 5, 2021, based on Lam. She stated that central authorities affirmed the conclusion and it had been taken to protect people’s wellbeing.”The statement I must create now is the toughest decision I have had to create in the previous seven weeks,” Lam said in a press conference, according to the Associated Press.”we would like to guarantee fairness and public security and health, and will need to be certain that the election is held in an open, fair and unbiased way. This choice is therefore crucial,” she said.As of July 30, police noted 149 other instances of Covid-19, bringing the city’s total to 3,151, according to the town’s wellbeing department.Hong Kong was originally hailed for its response to this outbreak, and managed to prevent widespread lockdowns that lots of countries enforced to stem this spread of the disease. On the other hand, that the coronavirus reemerged and supported instances attained new daily highs in recent weeks.The postponement of the election arrived after Hong Kong government announced Thursday that 12 pro-democracy nominees are disqualified from running in the upcoming elections. One of them was high profile activist, Joshua Wong, along with incumbent lawmakers Dennis Kwok and Alvin Yeung.According into Hong Kong legislation, an election could be postponed in the event the town’s chief executive believes it’s very likely to become “obstructed, disrupted, compromised or severely affected by riot or open violence or some other threat to public health and security.” Voting generally must occur inside 14 days of the first date, however the town’s chief also has power to create regulations whenever there are “events of crisis or public hazard.”The disqualification of this pro-democracy candidates brought criticism abroad, such as British Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab who advised the move.In an announcement on the united kingdom. government’s website, Raab said it was “clear they’ve been disqualified due to their political viewpoints, undermining the ethics of ‘One Country, Two Systems’ and also the rights and also freedoms guaranteed in the Joint Declaration and Hong Kong’s Basic Law.”Hong Kong was dominated under the “one country, two systems” policy because the former British colony returned to Chinese rule in 1997. That frame grants the Chinese land a mostly separate legal and economic system, also enables those living there restricted election rights.Rumors of a delay of the election were already trapping prior to the announcement.U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo on Thursday urged Hong Kong to move using the elections as planned.Following local press reports on a potential delay, pro-democracy activist Wong, stated on Twitter which “with (the) pandemic as an excuse to postpone the election is unquestionably a lie.”He explained hygiene measures could be stepped up to decrease the probability of disease during voting. The authorities reimposed social distancing principles and tightened the constraints further this past week. The steps were harder than those introduced while the health crisis first arose in the first portion of their year.Dine-in providers were suspended and parties of two or more individuals were prohibited in late July, while face masks were made compulsory in all public areas. “However, the (government) knows just to interfere with the election which was fair and free, possibly disqualifying my candidacy or to call off the election,” Wong said on Twitter.The September election could have become the town’s first because its contentious national safety legislation came into effect in the end of June. Beijing said the law is supposed to prohibit secession, subversion of state power, terrorism and international interference, but critics feared it could be used to crush dissent. An unofficial chief in July allegedly watched 600,000 people appear to cast a symbolic vote, according to Reuters, which cited that the resistance camp.Anyone convicted of an offence under the new federal security laws cannot stand as a candidate in elections to the legislative council or district councils.