OPINION: Greenwashing: “Behaviour or activities that make people believe a company is doing more to protect the environment than it really is.”
As an investor we search for alternatives with the fitting mix of threat and reward, but in addition we glance to put money into a approach that minimises the hurt these corporations we put money into are doing to the setting.
This is usually a delicate stability to realize, although. Many corporations are professional at presenting a “green” face to the investing public, whereas behind the scenes they behave in a approach inconsistent with that advertising message. In our funding travels we now have checked out many corporations that declare to be inexperienced however are clearly not.
One of many highest-profile greenwashing scandals in current occasions involved Volkswagen. The car-maker admitted to equipping tens of millions of its vehicles with software program that cheated on emissions exams, permitting Volkswagen to falsely inflate the “green-ness” of their vehicles. This had an actual value – practically $20 billion in fines and settlements, lasting reputational harm and the top of profitable careers for a lot of executives.
READ MORE:
* Monday ideas: How actual world change is affecting the sharemarket
* Monday ideas: KiwiSaver is your cash however have you learnt the place it’s?
* Three Monday ideas: Sharemarket winners and losers
Oil corporations are specialists at greenwashing. Regardless of inside paperwork displaying that corporations like Royal Dutch Shell, ExxonMobil and BP knew about local weather change risks many years in the past, the enterprise model for these corporations appears to not have modified. Simply carry on extracting extra oil and fuel.
In its most up-to-date report back to shareholders, Shell talked lengthy and onerous a few technique to thrive within the transition away from fossil gasoline dependance. But for each greenback Shell spends on clear power initiatives, the corporate spends practically $30 on new funding in fossil gasoline extraction.
At the moment that is greater than $50 billion a 12 months.
Shell says on the one hand that it “fully supports the Paris Agreement goal to limit warming below 2C and supports the transition towards a net zero emissions energy system”, but within the superb print Shell additionally says it has “no immediate plans to move to a net-zero emissions portfolio over our investment horizon of 10-20 years.”
123rf
Many corporations are professional at presenting a “green” face to the investing public, whereas behind the scenes they behave in a approach inconsistent with that advertising message. In our funding travels we now have checked out many corporations that declare to be inexperienced however are clearly not.
This can be a clear instance of greenwashing, a daring environmentally pleasant assertion of intent, however behind the scenes it’s carbon-emitting enterprise as normal.
The worst examples of greenwashing like Volkswagen and Shell are fairly simple for a cautious investor to determine, however there are many gray areas, too. One query we wrestle with is how a lot credit score ought to we give to an organization that’s genuinely attempting to transition to a low-carbon future however nonetheless emits huge quantities of local weather altering greenhouse gases?
One instance of that is NextEra Vitality, one of many largest electrical energy mills and distributors within the USA. Their web site proudly proclaims that NextEra Vitality is the world’s largest producer of wind and photo voltaic power. That’s true.
Sadly it’s also the 12th-largest emitter of greenhouse gases within the USA. Most just lately, NextEra emitted 45 million tons of CO2 from its coal and fuel fired electrical energy technology.
By comparability, New Zealand’s total CO2 emissions are round 35 million tons, round 20 per cent lower than this one firm.
We don’t put money into NextEra Vitality despite the fact that they’re making an effort to provide extra renewable power. Their said purpose is to scale back the carbon depth of their enterprise, and this may occur as they produce extra power from renewables. However they’re additionally persevering with to provide the identical quantity of electrical energy from fossil fuels, and can proceed to be one of many largest greenhouse fuel emitters within the USA. So be cautious once you see a declare like “world’s largest producer of wind and solar energy”.
So, what can we be taught right here? Be cynical when corporations declare to be inexperienced. Search for the details behind the declare, and don’t reward dangerous company behaviour along with your hard-earned KiwiSaver financial savings.
Paul Brownsey is chief funding officer at Pathfinder Asset Administration, and moral KiwiSaver supplier CareSaver. His views on this article are basic solely and usually are not suggestions for any explicit particular person in relation to any share or monetary product.
