Scott Morrison – Will Scott Morrison call an election this coming November?
Readers of Switzer
Daily may be interested to know the final figures for Upper Hunter in the
only contest that really matters, the two-party preferred vote. In the nearly
final count, the votes are 17,902 for Dave Layzell of the Nationals and 14,255
for Labor’s Jeff Drayton. The percentages are 55.7 for Layzell and 44.3 for
Drayton. The majority is 3,647 votes.
In March 2019,
Michael Johnsen (Nationals) had 19,341 votes (52.6 per cent) and the then Labor
candidate 17,456 (47.4 per cent). So, the majority was 1,885 votes. The
Nationals, therefore, have doubled their majority and secured a swing in their favour
of 3.1 per cent.
In my Switzer Daily
Liberals won the Tasmanian election as predicted, but what will happen in the
next Federal election?”, posted on Friday 14 May, my concluding paragraph
included this statement: “Upper Hunter will be won by the Nationals candidate,
David Layzell”. Note my lack of qualification. Note, also, that I did not predict
it would be close. So, this was a predictable result and I am surprised only
that so many people have expressed surprise.
I don’t retract
any predictions, but I do wish to elaborate on some. The first is this
statement: “I insist that 27 November 2021 is the single most likely date we’ll
go to the polls. The second most likely is 5 March 2022.” In other words, Josh
Frydenberg’s recent budget was the election budget. There won’t be another
before the election.
Morrison will seek
to dampen down speculation about an early election – and then decide on the 27
November date using the argument that speculation damages good government. He
will proceed to argue that the best way to kill the speculation is to have the
election. He will say that March is not suitable because it would mean that
federal and South Australian election campaigns would coincide. South Australia’s
fixed date is 19 March 2022.
At the back of Morrison’s
mind would be that the only disastrous period of his tenure as prime minister
was the summer of 2019-20. Better avoid a possible summer of disaster and a
possible third wave of coronavirus – by getting the election over before any summer
Referring to the
number of Coalition senators from 1 July 2022 I wrote: “My prediction that the
Coalition Senate number will be 37 carries with it a probability statement of
60 per cent” and then “the only Liberal in danger of defeat is Senator Amanda
Stoker.” I plan to return to that truth in a mid-June article.
My earlier article
will the next Federal Election be and will ScoMo win?”, posted on Wednesday
3 February, was the most widely read of my articles this year. In it I predicted
80 seats for the Coalition, being composed of 63 Liberals (up two) and 17
Nationals (up one).
My predicted Liberal
gains are already wrong. The Victorian and Western Australian redistributions
will not be neutral (as I had supposed) but will transfer a seat from Liberal
to Labor. Perhaps, therefore, the Liberals will gain Paterson from Labor. After
all Paterson does include Kurri Kurri, the object of the largesse arising from the
power of Angus Taylor.
My 17 Nationals
included Lingiari in the Northern Territory. Perhaps Lingiari will stay Labor,
but the 17th Nationals seat will be Hunter. Much depends on the
personal following of Joel Fitzgibbon just as, in Paterson, it depends on any
incumbency advantage currently held by its present Labor member, Meryl Swanson.
Upper Hunter told
us of something that has been going on for at least a decade now. Fifty years
ago, and a hundred years ago, the occupation “coal miner” was the occupation
most solidly associated with the left. It is now the occupation most moving
from left to right. This has occurred in all the countries of the Anglosphere.
For example, in
the United States, West Virginia was once solidly Democratic. It was one of
only eight states to vote for Democrat Michael Dukakis in his 1988 presidential
contest with George Bush Senior. It is now the second strongest Republican
state in the nation – and the second most dependent on coal mining.
The most strongly
Republican state is Wyoming. It’s very like a bigger-scale Upper Hunter. Once
solidly rural it was once rather conservative. It has now become part
agricultural and part coal mining – and even more conservative. As I say it’s
very like Upper Hunter. It is the state most dependent on coal mining.
is Distinguished Fellow of the PM Glynn Institute, Australian Catholic
University. [email protected])