© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A Boeing 747-8, one of two that had originally been ordered by a now-bankrupt Russian airline, is seen parked at Victorville Airport
By David Shepardson and Jeff Mason
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Air Force One subcontractor GDC Technics countersued Boeing (NYSE🙂 Co on Friday seeking at least $20 million after the largest U.S. airplane manufacturer canceled contracts for work on the aircraft that carries the U.S. president.
Boeing said in its suit filed April 7 that Texas-based GDC failed to complete interior work on the two heavily modified 747-8 Air Force One planes and is “roughly one year behind schedule in meeting its contractual obligations.”
GDC’s counterclaim argues it is “Boeing‘s mismanagement of the completion of two Air Force One presidential aircraft, not delays caused by GDC, that has caused a delay in the completion of those aircraft.”
A Boeing spokeswoman on Saturday declined to comment on GDC’s filing.
Boeing chose to utilize existing aircraft for the two replacement Air Force One aircraft rather than new planes, GDC said.
looked to GDC as a scapegoat to excuse its lack of performance on the aircraft to the United States Air Force,” GDC said, adding Boeing‘s “false” statements have damaged its reputation with the Air Force “and the aviation industry worldwide.”
In July 2018, Boeing received a $3.9 billion contract to build two 747-8 aircraft for use as Air Force One, due to be delivered by December 2024. A Boeing spokeswoman said on April 8 the planemaker still planned to meet the Air Force’s delivery schedule.
The Boeing 747-8s are designed to be like an airborne White House, able to fly in worst-case security scenarios such as nuclear war, and are modified with military avionics, advanced communications and a self-defense system.
Fintech Zoom or anyone involved with Fintech Zoom will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.